Privacy Policy & Cookies

Road Accident Claims Work Accident Claims Asbestos Exposure Claims Industrial Disease Claims Head and Brain Injury Claims Medical Negligence Claims Surgical Error Claims Travel Accident Claims Military Accident Claims Personal Injury Claims

How much?

FAQ

PI Information

Our PI Lawyers

0800 783 90190800 783 9019
0330 333 56560330 333 5656
Claim OnlineClaim Online
Text CLAIM to 82010 now, standard network rates applyText CLAIM to 82010
Network of offices throughout the UKVisit our UK offices

We'll call you back

Leave your details and we'll call you back between 8am and 8pm Monday to Friday, or between 9am and 5pm on Saturdays.

Name:

Best contact no:

Best contact time:


Home > News > Personal Injury News

5th July 2007

Council liable after claimant falls in ditch

The claimant was walking home through a rural area after attending a party. It was midnight and pitch dark as there was no street lighting.

As part of the construction of the road, it was necessary to build a concrete strengthening device to support the road. This created a structure alongside the grass verge at the side of the road with an unguarded drop of about three foot. A manmade ditch was situated within the grass verge. A footpath deviated to the left, away from the roadside, to take pedestrians away from the grass verge and the ditch. The claimant fell into the ditch, breaking his leg, when he decided to walk along the grass verge rather than follow the footpath.

The defendants said that given the footpath had been built in order to direct pedestrians away from the hazard, it was not foreseeable that anyone would walk on the grass verge. They also argued that the cost of providing a guard or fence to every potential hazard would be too much and that it was unreasonable to expect them to do so. After the accident, at a cost of £120, guardrails were erected at either side of the hazard.

The judge held that the structure was unique and created a sheer drop of three foot. Because the footpath was below the level of the road it was more secluded and it was therefore foreseeable that pedestrians would chose to stay near the road at night and walk on the grass verge. The judge held that the defendants had failed in their common law duty of care to the claimant as a pedestrian. However, because the claimant should have taken a torch, knowing that he would be walking home late; because he could have kept to the path; could have crossed the road or could have walked on the other side, the judge decided the claimant was liable for one third contributory negligence.

Compensation Claim

If you or anyone you know has suffered injury or illness through no fault of their own telephone us now for compensation claim advice.

Clear Answers' solicitors are experts in all personal injury matters. We will be able to advise you whether or not you have a valid accident claim for compensation. Our specialist personal injury lawyers will be happy to talk you through the process of making a claim in plain English and will be happy to answer any questions or queries you may have.

Telephone us now on 0800 783 9019 or complete one of our online compensation claim forms.

back to news index

print this page