Privacy Policy & Cookies

Road Accident Claims Work Accident Claims Asbestos Exposure Claims Industrial Disease Claims Head and Brain Injury Claims Medical Negligence Claims Surgical Error Claims Travel Accident Claims Military Accident Claims Personal Injury Claims

How much?

FAQ

PI Information

Our PI Lawyers

0800 783 90190800 783 9019
0330 333 56560330 333 5656
Claim OnlineClaim Online
Text CLAIM to 82010 now, standard network rates applyText CLAIM to 82010
Network of offices throughout the UKVisit our UK offices

We'll call you back

Leave your details and we'll call you back between 8am and 8pm Monday to Friday, or between 9am and 5pm on Saturdays.

Name:

Best contact no:

Best contact time:


Home > News > Personal Injury News


27 October 2005

Shambolic smoking ban won't prevent litigation, lawyers warn

Leading personal injury law firm Thompsons has described the government's proposed legislation to ban smoking in pubs and restaurants which sell food as "shambolic".

Thompsons, which acts for individuals made ill by exposure to smoke at work, says the Bill complicates the law, and will do nothing to protect employers from being sued by their employees.

John Hall, disease specialist at Thompsons' Southampton office said: "The Government has missed an opportunity to pass comprehensive legislation protecting a significant proportion of the workforce in the English hospitality trade. The proposed legislation is shambolic and further complicates an already complicated area of health and safety law."

Under the Health and Safety at Work Act, employers have a duty to protect their staff from avoidable risks to their health and safety.

A partial ban will not prevent an employee who develops a passive smoking-related illness in a bar that is exempt from the ban, from making a personal injury claim.

"The issue is one of negligence. It makes no difference whether there is a ban in place in an establishment or not - if the employer negligently exposes an employee to second-hand smoke, and there are reasonable grounds to state that it was that exposure which caused the employee to become ill, then the employer is liable for prosecution."

Thompsons' written evidence to the House of Commons Health Committee warned against allowing another "asbestos horror" to develop, where government dithering cost thousands of avoidable deaths.

back to news index

print this page